Neuroimaging: what neuroradiological features distinguish


Download Neuroimaging: what neuroradiological features distinguish


Preview text

Downloaded from adc.bmj.com on August 6, 2014 - Published by group.bmj.com

Original article

Neuroimaging: what neuroradiological features distinguish abusive from non-abusive head trauma? A systematic review
A M Kemp,1 T Jaspan,2 J Griffiths,3 N Stoodley,4 M K Mann,5 V Tempest,6 S A Maguire2

1School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK 2Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK 3Community Child Health, Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Trust, Swansea, UK 4North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK 5Child Health, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK 6Support Unit for Research Evidence, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
Correspondence to Professor Alison Kemp, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, UHW, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XN, UK; [email protected]
Accepted 11 August 2011 Published Online First 30 September 2011

ABSTRACT Objectives To identify the evidence base behind the neuroradiological features that differentiate abusive head trauma (AHT) from non-abusive head trauma (nAHT). Design Systematic review. Setting Literature search of 14 databases, websites, textbooks, conference abstracts and references (1970–February 2010). Studies had two independent reviews (three if disputed) and critical appraisal. Patients Primary comparative studies of children <11 years old hospitalised with AHT and nAHT diagnosed on CT or MRI. Main outcome measures Neuroradiological features that differentiated AHT from nAHT. Results 21 studies of children predominantly <3 years old were analysed. Subdural haemorrhages (SDH) were significantly associated with AHT (OR 8.2, 95% CI 6.1 to 11). Subarachnoid haemorrhages were seen equally in AHT and nAHT and extradural haemorrhages (EDH) were significantly associated with nAHT (OR for AHT 0.1, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.18). Multiple (OR 6, 95% CI 2.5 to 14.4), interhemispheric (OR 7.9, 95% CI 4.7 to 13), convexity (OR 4.9, 95% CI 1.3 to 19.4) and posterior fossa haemorrhages (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1 to 6) were associated with AHT. Hypoxic-ischaemic injury (HII) (OR 3.7, 95% CI 1.4 to 10) and cerebral oedema (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.0 to 4.5) were significantly associated with AHT, while focal parenchymal injury was not a discriminatory feature. SDH of low attenuation were more common in AHT than in nAHT. Conclusion Multiple SDH over the convexity, interhemispheric haemorrhages, posterior fossa SDH, HII and cerebral oedema are significantly associated with AHT and should be considered together with clinical features when identifying the condition.
INTRODUCTION Abusive head trauma (AHT) is the most serious form of physical child abuse with an estimated annual incidence of 21 per 100 000 infants, an associated 30% mortality and 50% morbidity in survivors.1 Studies estimate that 25–30% of children under the age of 2 years who are hospitalised with head injury have AHT.2–4 In the absence of a plausible explanation of non-intentional trauma, there is a strong likelihood of AHT, however making this diagnosis with confidence remains a challenge.
Neuroimaging is undertaken in these infants for clinical diagnostic purposes either because they present with unexplained neurological or encephalopathic signs or a history of head trauma,5 or

What is already known on this topic
▶ Abusive head trauma (AHT) is known to cause intracranial traumatic injury.
▶ Subdural haemorrhage (SDH) is an indicator of suspected AHT in infants presenting with unexplained traumatic head injury or where the explanation given is not plausible.
▶ Other intracranial injuries can coexist, however the weight of scientific evidence behind these features has yet to be defined.
What this study adds
▶ This is the first meta-analysis of neuroradiological features of AHT describing the evidence-base behind these features.
▶ Multiple SDH over the convexity, interhemispheric haemorrhages, posterior fossa SDH, hypoxic-ischaemic injury and cerebral oedema are significantly associated with AHT.
▶ Data to inform decisions about the likelihood of AHT in the clinical and legal child protection arenas are presented.
they are undergoing a comprehensive investigation for suspected physical abuse.6 The neuroimaging must be interpreted carefully, in the context of the historical or clinical features, giving due consideration to causes such as non intentional trauma, birth related injury, bleeding disorders, encephalitis, meningitis, congenital abnormality or metabolic conditions such as glutaric aciduria.7
CT and MRI techniques have advanced considerably over the past 30 years, facilitating the visualisation of extra-axial and intra-cerebral lesions in these children. Neuroradiologists describe various imaging patterns that are indicative of AHT. However, we are not aware of any published systematic reviews that evaluate the strength of the scientific evidence behind these features and have therefore conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to identify and describe the weight of evidence behind neuroradiological features that are associated with AHT.
METHODS We searched 14 databases, four websites, textbooks and conference abstracts (figure 1) with over 100 keyword combinations from 1970 to February

Arch Dis Child 2011;96:1103–1112. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2011-300630

1103

Original article

Downloaded from adc.bmj.com on August 6, 2014 - Published by group.bmj.com

2010 (see online supplementary appendix 1). We performed a recursive search of the literature from reference lists of articles retrieved. Relevant foreign language articles were translated.
The literature includes a variety of terms for AHT, such as inflicted head trauma, non-accidental head injury, shaken baby syndrome and inflicted head injury. Our literature search encompassed all of these terms. However, for consistency we adopted the term AHT to describe “an inflicted injury to the head and its contents” in line with the recent proposal by the American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect.8
Inclusion criteria were that the studies had to be published, peer reviewed, primary comparative studies of children under 11 years of age who were hospitalised with head injury and had AHT or non-abusive head trauma (nAHT). Studies were included where intra-cranial injury had been diagnosed on CT or MRI. We excluded review articles and expert opinion and postmortem studies.
Quality standards We excluded studies that were methodologically weak due to significant bias, confounding factors, case attrition or incomplete ascertainment. It was essential that the included studies had a high surety of child abuse. To guarantee this, we used our previously published definitions of abuse and only included studies in categories 1–3 (table 1). We chose this approach whereby a definition of abuse was based upon the outcome of a legal or multi-agency child protection investigation or stated criteria where diagnosis was based upon additional features and did not rely on the neuroradiological findings, to minimise the risk of circularity in a condition where there is no ‘gold standard’ diagnostic test. nAHT was defined as a witnessed traumatic event, where the cause of injury was stated or where child abuse had been actively excluded.
The criteria were applied by two independent reviewers with experience in child protection, paediatric neuroradiology, neurology and ophthalmology. All were trained in critical

appraisal and met on a monthly basis to discuss the review process and to ensure consistency of approach. A third review was conducted for discrepancies. Data extraction standards were derived from guidance from the NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination.9 We wrote to authors to elucidate certain points. We were privileged to have access to original datasets that provided clarification of data.10–12

Statistics
We conducted a meta-analysis of studies that ascertained a defined population where there was consecutive case enrolment over a defined time period of all children with AHT and nAHT and present a descriptive analysis when this was not possible. We grouped studies according to the primary items of interest: subdural haemorrhage (SDH), subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH), extradural haemorrhage (EDH), hypoxicischaemic injury (HII), parenchymal injury, cerebral oedema and closed head injury; secondary items included the number, location, distribution and attenuation/signal characteristics (on CT) of extra-axial haemorrhages.
We used OR as a measure of effect with 95% CIs. We pooled data using a random effects model to allow for both intra and inter study variances and to give a more conservative estimate of the effect. The level of heterogeneity was expressed using both the Q test (Cochrane’s χ2) with a cut off of p<0.1 and the I2 index

Table 1 Definitions of child abuse

Categories Criteria used to define abuse

1

Abuse confirmed at case conference, family, civil or criminal

court proceedings or admitted by perpetrator or witnessed

2

Abuse confirmed by stated criteria including multidisciplinary

assessment

3

Abuse defined by stated criteria

4

Abuse stated but no supporting detail given

5

Suspected abuse

Figure 1 Systematic review search strategy and review process. 1104

Arch Dis Child 2011;96:1103–1112. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2011-300630

Downloaded from adc.bmj.com on August 6, 2014 - Published by group.bmj.com

Original article

which describes the percentage of total variation across studies that is not due to chance but rather a result of heterogeneity, where I2 of 25%, 50% and 75% represented low, moderate and high levels of heterogeneity, respectively.13 MIX: meta-analysis made easy version 1.7 for Windows software was used to present data in forest plots (ordered according to the weight of each study) for each outcome, showing the calculated OR with 95% CI.
RESULTS Twenty-one studies met the inclusion criteria (table 2), representing data from initial neuroimaging of 2353 children. There

were 893 cases of AHT and 1460 of nAHT. Ninety-six per cent of children with nAHT had non intentional head trauma, while a small number of children had sustained their pathology from organic causes (18) or birth injury (44).
Authors used different terminology to describe their study type. However, after reviewing study methodology we identified 18 comparative studies with consecutive case enrolment of children from a defined population who were hospitalised over a defined time period3 4 10–12 14–26 and one case control study.27 These studies were eligible for meta-analyses. Two comparative case series28 29 had selective case enrolment and were not suitable for meta-analysis, however they provided useful data that were

Table 2 Summary of included studies

Author

Study type*

Category Category of of abuse head trauma

AHT: no. children nAHT: no. children

Age group Imaging (years)

Adamo et al26

Cross-sectional

2

HI

Bechtel et al10 Datta et al14 Duhaime et al3

Cross-sectional Cross-sectional Cross-sectional

1+2

HI

1

SDH

1

HI

Ettaro et al11

Comparative case series 3

HI

(consecutive enrolment

of all children)

Ewing-Cobbs et al15 Prospective longitudinal 1

TBI

study (consecutive case

enrolment)

Feldman et al16

Prospective comparative 2

SDH

case series (consecutive

case enrolment)

Goldstein et al17

Cross-sectional

1

TBI

Hettler et al18

Cross-sectional

1+3

TBI

Hymel et al27

Case–control

1

TBI

Ichord et al19
Keenan et al20 Kelly et al21

Consecutive cohort study
Cross-sectional
Cross-sectional

3

TBI

1

TBI

1+3

SDH

54

164 (suspected abuse actively

0–3

excluded)

15

67 (2 MVC, 65 falls (73% ≤4 ft))

0–2

49

14 (3 trauma, 11 medical causes) 0–2

24

76 (7 MVC, 69 other trauma);

0–2

social worker review of all cases

89

288 (50 MVC, 238 other trauma) 0–3

(excluded concussion/contusion/

cerebral laceration)

31

29 (18 MVC, 11 other trauma)

0–6

39 (12 indeterminate cause) 14 49
39
30
80
41

15 (9 MVC, 3 falls >10 ft, 3 other 0–3 trauma)

26 (16 MVC, 10 other trauma)

0–16

114 (8 MVC, 58 falls >3 ft, 37 falls 0–3 <3 ft, 11 other)

39 accidental head injury stated 0–4 with active exclusion of abuse in cases of TBI

22 (4 MVC, 18 falls)

0–3

(excluded coagulopathy, penetrating

injury, burns, arrest and CPR)

72 (43 MVC, 17 falls,

0–2

12 other trauma)

23 (8 MVC, 14 falls (12 >1 m),

0-2

1 other)

(excluded post-operative

conditions, haematological disease)

All had CT All had CT All had CT and/or MRI CT and/or MRI as clinically indicated All had CT and/or MRI
All had CT and/or MRI
All had CT
All had CT and/or MRI All had CT All had CT
All had MRI
All had CT and/or MRI All had CT and/or MRI

McKinney et al22 Reece et al4

Cross-sectional Cross-sectional

1

HI

1, 2, 3

HI

Shugerman et al23 Cross-sectional (SDH and EDH cases)

1

SDH

Tung et al28

Retrospective

1

SDH

comparative case series

Tzioumi et al24

Cross-sectional

1

SDH

Vinchon et al12

Cross-sectional

2

HI

Vinchon et al29

Prospective

2

HI

comparative case series

Wells et al25

Retrospective

2

TBI

consecutive case

series (equivalent

to cross-sectional)

11

38 (abuse actively excluded)

0–3

51

144 (MVC, witnessed injuries)

0–3

28 SDH 2 EDH 9 21 57 12

25 SDH, 32 EDH defined on

0–3

discharge diagnosis, uncertain

cases excluded

38 (2 MVC, 17 other trauma,

0–3

19 birth injury)

17 (5 MVC, 5 significant falls,

0–2

5 other trauma, 2 medical cause)

93 (12 MVC, 55 trauma,

0–2

21 birth injury, 5 medical cause)

8 (4 trauma, 4 birth related)

<1

148

109 witnessed trauma

0-3

(36 intent uncertain)

All had CT and/or MRI CT and/or MRI as clinically indicated All had CT
All had CT All had CT All had CT and/or MRI All had CT and MRI All had CT

*Study type is given according to author definition when stated. Where enrolment was consecutive and included all children from a defined population, this is stated and deemed equivalent to a cross-sectional study design. AHT, abusive head trauma; CPR, cardiopulmonary resuscitation; EDH, extradural haemorrhage; HI, head injury; MVC, motor vehicle crash; nAHT, non-abusive head trauma; SDH, subdural haemorrhage; TBI, traumatic brain injury.

Arch Dis Child 2011;96:1103–1112. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2011-300630

1105

Original article

Downloaded from adc.bmj.com on August 6, 2014 - Published by group.bmj.com

subject to a descriptive analysis. Eight studies ascertained all children with head injuries (HI),3 4 10–12 22 26 29 seven included children with traumatic brain injuries (TBI)15 17–20 25 27 and six included those with SDH,14 16 21 23 24 28 one of which also included children with EDH.23 Eighteen studies addressed a similar age range and provided an analysis of children less than 3 years old.3 4 10–12 14 16 18–26 28 29 One study17 included children up to 16 years of age,
however exclusion of this study from the meta-analyses made no
significant differences to the overall results. Details from cases
ranked 1–3 for a security of diagnosis for abuse were included in the meta-analyses. Two studies16 25 included details of 12 and 36
cases where abuse was suspected but not confirmed; when these
cases were added into the abuse group, thus broadening the cat-
egory of abuse, there was no difference to the overall results.

Eleven studies stated that neuroimaging included an initial CT scan and/or MRI,3 4 11 12 14 15 17 20–22 29 nine CT alone10 16 18 23–28 and one MRI alone.19 All children included in the study received neuroimaging; in two studies the authors stated that investigations were performed according to clinical indications.3 4 Eight studies incorporated an independent radiological review14 15 19 20 22 25 27 28 or selective review of discrepant radiology reports,23 while the remainder appeared to utilise the initial radiology report.
Extra-axial haemorrhages It was possible to calculate the OR for SDH, SAH and EDH in AHT for studies where the inclusion criteria were children with TBI or HI (figure 2).

Figure 2 Meta-analysis of extra-axial haemorrhage as an indicator of abusive head trauma.

1106

Arch Dis Child 2011;96:1103–1112. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2011-300630

Downloaded from adc.bmj.com on August 6, 2014 - Published by group.bmj.com

Original article

Subdural haemorrhage The clear association of SDH with AHT was confirmed by an OR of 8.2 (95% CI 6.1 to 11; p<0.0001), with studies having a low level of heterogeneity (Q=9.7 (df=9), p=0.36, I2=8%) (figure 2). The highest OR was derived from the Duhaime study.3 However, when this study was excluded from the calculation, the OR was not significantly altered.
Subarachnoid haemorrhage SAH was described in eight studies of children with HI or TBI (figure 2). The OR for AHT was 0.98 (95% CI 0.47 to

2.0; p=0.95). The heterogeneity was high (Q=26 (df=7), p<0.001, I2=73.4%). Reece et al was the only study to identify a significant association between SAH and AHT.4 When this study was excluded from the calculation, the heterogeneity fell (Q=5.7 (df=6), p=0.46, I2=0%), but there was still no significant association with nAHT (OR for AHT 0.6, 95% CI 0.4 to 0.9).
Extradural haemorrhage Nine studies confirmed a significant association between EDH and nAHT (figure 2). The overall OR for EDH and

Figure 3 Meta-analysis of the characteristics of extra-axial haemorrhage as an indicator of abusive head trauma. SDH, subdural haemorrhage.

Arch Dis Child 2011;96:1103–1112. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2011-300630

1107

Original article

Downloaded from adc.bmj.com on August 6, 2014 - Published by group.bmj.com

AHT was 0.1 (95% CI 0.07 to 0.18; p<0.0001) (Q=5.2 (df=8), p=0.7, I2=0%).
Distribution, appearance and numbers of extra-axial haemorrhages Studies selected different characteristics of extra-axial haemorrhages for comparison (figure 3). Meta-analyses of studies that described the number and distribution of extra-axial haemorrhages showed that interhemispheric haemorrhages were significantly associated with AHT, with an OR of 9.5 (95% CI 6.1 to 14.9; p<0.001) and heterogeneity between studies was low (Q=2.6 (df=5), p=0.7, I2=0%). There were only two studies that counted children with multiple extra-axial haemorrhages, both demonstrating a strong association with AHT and an overall OR of 6 (95% CI 2.5 to 14.4; p<0.001) (Q=0.06 (df=1), p=0.8, I2=0%). SDH over the convexities had an OR of 4.9 (95% CI 1.3 to 19.4; p=0.02), but the heterogeneity of this latter group of studies was high (Q=8.1 (df=2), p=0.017, I2=75.3%).
Infra-tentorial/posterior fossa haemorrhages were associated with AHT with an overall OR for AHT of 2.5 (95% CI 1 to 6;

p=0.04) (Q=1.5 (df=2), p=0.47, I2=0%). In three studies it was possible to calculate the OR for bilateral SDH (OR 2.8, 95% CI 0.8 to 9.6; p=0.09), which did not reach significance. The heterogeneity between studies was also high (Q=6.3 (df=2), p=0.04, I2=68%).
Attenuation of extra-axial haemorrhages on CT imaging The terminology used to describe the attenuation of extraaxial haemorrhages on CT varied considerably between studies and data were presented in different formats which precluded meta-analysis. Older studies inferred the age of the lesion from the appearance of SDH; for example, high attenuation collections were described as acute haemorrhages and low attenuation lesions as chronic SDH. Later studies described the SDH or collections in terms of their radiological appearance (table 3).
Table 3 shows that, overall, multiple SDH of different attenuations were reported on initial CT, predominantly in AHT.14 16 21 25 26 Studies emphasised the finding that low attenuation haemorrhages were more commonly seen in

Table 3 Attenuation of subdural haemorrhages on neuroimaging in children with AHT and in those with nAHT

Author Neuroimaging

Children with AHT Data as described in each study

nAHT Data as described in each study

Interpretation

Adamo et al26 Initial CT
Datta et al14 Initial CT 63/64 (1 MRI) (follow-up MRI (1–12 days) in 25) Ewing-Cobbs et al15 Initial CT 59/60 (day 1)

24/54 children with HI had SDH due to AHT 58% of subdural collections were hypodense
32/49 children with SDH due to AHT had multiple SDH In 26/32 the SDH were of different attenuation (6 cases only seen on MRI)
26/31 children had 52 SDH

28/164 children with HI had SDH 14% of subdural collections were hypodense
3/14 children with SDH had multiple SDH which were the same hyperdense attenuation (2 motor vehicle crashes and 1 coagulation disorder) 20/29 children had 20 SDH

Patients who presented with hypodense and hyperdense SDH were more likely to have AHT (OR 6.39, 95% CI 3.4 to 11.9) Specifically, patients with hypodense SDH were more likely to have AHT (OR 20.6, 95% CI 6.7 to 63) Children with SDH from AHT were more likely to have multiple SDH of different attenuation
Low attenuation SDH were only reported in AHT

Follow-up MRI 24/31 AHT and 14/29 NAHT (mean 2.6 days post admission)

43 acute 6 subacute 3 chronic

14 acute 6 subacute No subdural hygromas recorded

4/31 children with AHT had subdural hygromas

Feldman et al16 Initial CT

22/39 children with SDH were acute

15/15 children had acute SDH

5/39 children had acute and chronic SDH 12/39 had chronic SDH

Multiple SDH of different attenuations and those of low attenuation were only seen in AHT, while nAHT SDH were all of high attenuation

Hymel et al27 Initial CT

8/39 children with AHT had low attenuation large (non-acute) extra-axial fluid

0/39 children with accidental closed head injury had (non-acute) extra-axial fluid

Low attenuation extra-axial fluid was seen exclusively in AHT (Fisher’s exact test p=0.005)

Kelly et al21 Initial CT

22/41 children with SDH had SDH which were either non-acute or (when multiple) of greater than one age

None of 23 nAHT had SDH of different ages

SDH of different attenuations or of low attenuation were only seen in AHT

Wells et al25 Initial CT images

35/148 children had acute intracranial haemorrhage in association with low attenuation subdural hygroma

Low attenuation subdural hygromas were not recorded in any of 109 nAHT cases

SDH of different attenuations more likely to be seen in AHT

Tung et al28 Non-contrast CT: on day 1 for 11 NAHT and at presentation for AHT

Homogeneous (uniform attenuation) hyper-attenuating SDH in 3/9 (33%) children
Heterogeneous (different attenuations in the same haematoma) SDH in 6/9 (67%) cases

Homogeneous hyperdense SDH on 28/38 (74%) scans (p=0.045)
Heterogeneous SDH in 7/38 (18%) cases of nAHT (p=0.008)

Vinchon et al29 Initial CT

Mixed attenuation collections in 11/12

Mixed attenuation collections in 5/8 nAHT cases

AHT, abusive head trauma; HI, head injury; nAHT, non-abusive head trauma; SDH, subdural haemorrhage.

nAHT SDH were predominantly high attenuation SDH
SDH of mixed attenuation reported in both AHT and nAHT but more significantly associated with AHT SDH of mixed attenuation reported in AHT and nAHT

1108

Arch Dis Child 2011;96:1103–1112. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2011-300630

Downloaded from adc.bmj.com on August 6, 2014 - Published by group.bmj.com

Original article

AHT than in nAHT.15 16 21 25–27 Two studies28 29 reported SDH of mixed attenuation (different attenuation in the same SDH): Tung et al stated they were seen significantly more often in AHT than in nAHT, while Vinchon noted that they were equally prevalent in both conditions.
Intra-cerebral lesions Cerebral oedema was significantly associated with AHT (OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.04 to 4.46; p=0.04); the heterogeneity was moderate (Q=15.8 (df=5), p=0.008, I2=68%). The studies failed to describe the extent or distribution of the oedema (figure 4).
Studies recorded different components of focal parenchymal injury, namely haemorrhage or contusion, or simply referred to parenchymal injury. The overall OR suggests that focal parenchymal injury is not a discriminatory feature for AHT (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.6 to 1.6; p=0.86) (Q=20 (df=11), p=0.04, I2=46%).

Three studies reported shear injury: Hymel et al27 and Ichord et al19 both noted one case in the AHT and nAHT groups, respectively, while Ewing-Cobbs et al15 commented on an unexpected exclusive association with nAHT (9/29 versus 0/31; p=0.001). Only one study14 commented on diffuse axonal injury that was reported in 1/49 cases with AHT.
Three studies addressed HII in children with head trauma.19 20 22 The study of Ichord et al was the only one based purely upon MRI findings and stated that the HII changes were predominantly bilateral and generalised in 9/22 cases of AHT in comparison to 1/30 cases of nAHT. Children with HII had a significantly greater association with seizures (p=0.01, Fishers exact test), a lower Glasgow Coma Score on admission (p=0.002, Mann–Whitney), a higher requirement for ventilation on admission and a higher requirement for subsequent rehabilitation (p<0.001, Fisher’s exact test). The overall OR for HII in association with AHT was 3.7 (95% CI 1.4 to 10;

Figure 4 Meta-analysis of intracranial features as an indicator of abusive head trauma.

Arch Dis Child 2011;96:1103–1112. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2011-300630

1109

Original article

Downloaded from adc.bmj.com on August 6, 2014 - Published by group.bmj.com

Figure 5 Meta-analysis of closed head injury as an indicator for abusive head trauma.

p=0.01); heterogeneity between the three studies was low (Q=2.6 (df=2), p=0.27, I2=23.7%).
Closed head injury In eight studies where the comparison group were predominantly traumatic cases of head injury and the authors had documented coexisting skull fractures, it was possible to calculate an OR for closed head injury (intracranial injury without skull fracture confirmed on skull x-ray or CT) (figure 5). The OR for closed head injury in AHT was 4.6 (95% CI 2.9 to 7.5; p<0.001), with moderate heterogeneity (Q=18 (df=8), p=0.02, I2=55%).
Multiple associated findings All studies confirmed that children in either group could present with multiple features on neuroimaging; however, only three studies attempted to determine whether different combinations of features were associated with AHT. Wells et al25 undertook a multiple logistic regression analysis and identified four significant variables: (1) convexity SDH; (2) interhemispheric SDH; (3) low attenuation subdural fluid; and (4) absent skull fracture. The authors evaluated combinations of these features on initial CT imaging and their predictive powers for AHT. Using a 0.45 cut-off point in their logistic model, the prediction for AHT had a sensitivity of 84% (95% CI 78% to 90%) and specificity of 83% (95% CI 74% to 89%). EwingCobbs et al15 showed that combinations of SAH and/or SDH with interhemispheric haemorrhage had a strong association with AHT (OR 11, 95% CI 3 to 41; p<0.001).
Ichord et al19 compared the MRI profile of traumatic injuries (extra-axial haemorrhages, cortical contusion, parenchymal injury, white matter haemorrhage and shearing injury) and HII. They showed that bilateral HII in association with, but not co-localising with, traumatic injuries was more common in AHT (9/22) than in nAHT (1/31) (p<0.001) in comparison with three other combinations, namely: (1) mixed traumatic and ischaemic lesions anatomically contiguous or co-localising, (2) traumatic lesions without associated ischaemic lesions and (3) indeterminate focal lesions, which did not appear to be discriminatory.
DISCUSSION We have described the weight of evidence behind the neuroradiology of AHT and confirmed that there are a number of features that are significantly associated with the diagnosis. At a time when debate continues about clinicians’ ability to distinguish AHT from nAHT, statistical confirmation of these associations may lead to less disagreement in the clinical, forensic
1110

and legal setting. Features significantly associated with AHT included SDH, that were frequently multiple, located within the interhemispheric fissure, over the convexity and in the posterior fossa. AHT was more likely in the context of a closed head injury, while SAH were found to be non-discriminatory and EDH were significantly associated with nAHT.
Included studies showed that HII was significantly associated with AHT, as was cerebral oedema, whereas focal parenchymal injury was not a discriminatory feature. Shearing injury and diffuse axonal injury were rarely reported, precluding analysis. With the exception of the study of Ichord et al,19 this analysis is based predominantly upon CT imaging, which remains the recommended first line investigation for suspected AHT. The evidence base will inevitably increase in the future once more large scale studies of MRI findings are published. Early MRI is increasingly recommended alongside CT as it enables more sensitive detection and characterisation of intracerebral disruptive lesions, oedema and HII and can identify extra-axial haemorrhages in locations obscure to CT imaging30 and the anatomical compartment(s) in which the extra-axial haemorrhage lie(s).
This systematic review has the merit of analysing several similar studies that drew upon populations of children less than 3 years of age. The limitations include variation in the composition of nAHT groups, inclusion criteria and imaging techniques used, together with small study numbers and data sets that support some of the meta-analyses. However, the heterogeneity of the meta-analyses was generally low to moderate. The forest plots summarise the current comparative studies in this field and reflect consistency in their findings.
Children with head trauma from either cause may present with different combinations of neuroradiological features. While the data could not be combined into a comprehensive multivariate analysis, three studies15 19 25 suggested that certain combinations of the indicative features have the potential to predict AHT.
The more recent studies that included diffusion weighted MRI findings19 22 provide confirmation of the association between HII and AHT.31–34 Although this association is increasingly recognised, the proposed mechanism of HII remains poorly understood. Multiple factors are proposed, such as respiratory insufficiency in an infant who is subjected to delayed medical attention, repeated traumatic events or damage to the respiratory control centres in the brainstem.19 31 Ichord et al confirmed the association of ventilatory support in children with HII and AHT, which the authors proposed may support some of these theories. They also confirmed the greater association
Arch Dis Child 2011;96:1103–1112. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2011-300630

Downloaded from adc.bmj.com on August 6, 2014 - Published by group.bmj.com

Original article

of seizures in children with AHT and suggested that the seizures may be related to the HII and exacerbate further damage to the brain itself through excitotoxic mechanisms or by inducing further respiratory insufficiency.19
A descriptive analysis of the attenuation of SDH on CT imaging supports an association of multiple SDH of different attenuation, and low attenuation SDH, with AHT. In the past these findings have been interpreted as indicative of repetitive or previous episodes of inflicted head injury.14 27 However, thinking behind this interpretation is changing. Vinchon et al29 listed several factors that affect the neuroimaging appearance of SDH, all of which may change over different time scales. These include the degradation of haemoglobin, the state of hydration of the red blood cells, the integrity of cell membranes, the protein content of the blood clot, the rate of sedimentation and concentration of red blood cells and the amount of cerebrospinal (CSF) fluid within the collection. Such factors can all potentially affect the appearance of acute subdural collections on scans and there is no reason to believe that all extra-axial haematomas evolve or resolve at the same rate. Dias et al35 urged caution when interpreting a hypodense collection as chronic: they describe a low attenuation subdural collection that was not present on a scan performed within 3 h of injury but appeared on a second scan 17 h later. Vinchon et al29 highlight the lack of evidence in this field and suggest that further research is required to explore time-related changes in MRI signals in the sedimentary component of extra-axial haemorrhages utilising T1-weighted and FLAIR sequences.
SDH of mixed attenuation were reported in both AHT and nAHT, a finding that has previously been interpreted as rebleeding into a chronic SDH, akin to that described in the elderly due to leakage from the vascularised pseudomembranes that develop in an organising SDH.36–38 However, there is no evidence that the resolution of SDH in infancy bears any similarity to that in the elderly adult. It is currently proposed that a “mixed-density SDH reflects the combination of high attenuation blood from acute haemorrhage or clot retraction and lower density fluid from unclotted blood, serum, or CSF”.28 Case studies describe traumatic tears in the arachnoid membrane leading to ingress of CSF which may mix with the high attenuation blood within an acute SDH.39 40 Vinchon et al undertook a series of CT scans in infants who had motor vehicle crashes and showed how mixed attenuation SDH developed within 24 h of the traumatic event.41 Serial MR imaging is likely to be of benefit when interpreting these lesions over time.12
In a previous systematic review we confirmed the positive association with AHT of clinical features including retinal haemorrhages, apnoea, rib fractures and absence of skull fractures.42 To date, there have been no large studies that have carried out a multivariate analysis of combined clinical and neuroradiological findings to determine their specificity for AHT. Clinical and forensic assessment must include a history, detailing the biomechanical parameters of proposed explanations for injury, a thorough examination and investigations to describe associated clinical findings. Careful interpretation of the full clinical picture, together with the neuroradiological findings on CT and early MRI, should facilitate greater diagnostic confidence. Standardised reporting and data collection for all young children with head injury would enable large scale epidemiological studies to compare neuroradiological changes as they relate to clinical features for AHT and nAHT.
In conclusion, this systematic review confirms that there are neuro-radiological features that are significantly associated with

AHT. While these findings have clinical application and can be used to inform child protection, and family and Criminal Court decisions, further prospective comparative studies are indicated in the context of rapidly developing neuroimaging techniques.
Acknowledgements The authors are extremely grateful to Dr K Bechtel, Dr L Ettaro and Professor M Vinchon for kindly providing access to raw data from the relevant studies. This work is based on reviews conducted by the Welsh Child Protection Systematic Review Group: T Abdelnour, M Barber, R Brooks, L Cole, S Datta, J deWaterNaude, M Gawne-Cain, C Graham, J Griffiths, T Jaspan, N John, R Jones, K Kontos, A Liu, A Mott, A Naughton, M Northey, L Price, I Prosser, S Rajaram, A Rawlinson, J Saunders, M Schmidt, J Sibert, D Slade, N Stoodley and P Watts. The authors would also like to acknowledge the statistical advice provided by Dr Zoe Lawson and Dr Daniel Farewell, Department of General Practice and Epidemiology, Cardiff University.
Funding This study was funded by the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (NSPCC), the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH) and the Wales Office of Research and Development.
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
REFERENCES
1. Jayawant S, Rawlinson A, Gibbon F, et al. Subdural haemorrhages in infants: population based study. BMJ 1998;317:1558–61.
2. Dashti SR, Decker DD, Razzaq A, et al. Current patterns of inflicted head injury in children. Pediatr Neurosurg 1999;31:302–6.
3. Duhaime AC, Alario AJ, Lewander WJ, et al. Head injury in very young children: mechanisms, injury types, and ophthalmologic findings in 100 hospitalized patients younger than 2 years of age. Pediatrics 1992;90:179–85.
4. Reece RM, Sege R. Childhood head injuries: accidental or inflicted? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2000;154:11–15.
5. National Collaborating Centre for Acute Care. Head Injury. Triage, Assessment, Investigation and Early Management of Head Injury in Infants, Children and Adults. London: National Collaborating Centre for Acute Care, 2003. http://www.nice.org. uk/nicemedia/live/11836/36260/36260.pdf (accessed 18 July 2011).
6. Child Protection Companion. http://www.rcpch.ac.uk/sites/default/files/asset_ library/Health%20Services/ChildProtCompL.pdf (accessed 18 July 2011)
7. Kemp AM. Investigating subdural haemorrhage in infants. Arch Dis Child 2002;86:98–102.
8. Christian CW, Block R. Abusive head trauma in infants and children. Pediatrics 2009;123:1409–11.
9. NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Undertaking Systematic Reviews of Research on Effectiveness. CRD’s Guidance for Those Carrying out or Commissioning Reviews CRD report no. 4. Second edition. York: University of York 2001.
10. Bechtel K, Stoessel K, Leventhal JM, et al. Characteristics that distinguish accidental from abusive injury in hospitalized young children with head trauma. Pediatrics 2004;114:165–8.
11. Ettaro L, Berger RP, Songer T. Abusive head trauma in young children: characteristics and medical charges in a hospitalized population. Child Abuse Negl 2004;28:1099–111.
12. Vinchon M, Defoort-Dhellemmes S, Desurmont M, et al. Accidental and nonaccidental head injuries in infants: a prospective study. J Neurosurg 2005;102:380–4.
13. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, et al. Measuring inconsistency in metaanalyses. BMJ 2003;327:557–60.
14. Datta S, Stoodley N, Jayawant S, et al. Neuroradiological aspects of subdural haemorrhages. Arch Dis Child 2005;90:947–51.
15. Ewing-Cobbs L, Prasad M, Kramer L, et al. Acute neuroradiologic findings in young children with inflicted or noninflicted traumatic brain injury. Childs Nerv Syst 2000;16:25–33; discussion 34.
16. Feldman KW, Bethel R, Shugerman RP, et al. The cause of infant and toddler subdural hemorrhage: a prospective study. Pediatrics 2001;108:636–46.
17. Goldstein B, Kelly MM, Bruton D, et al. Inflicted versus accidental head injury in critically injured children. Crit Care Med 1993;21:1328–32.
18. Hettler J, Greenes DS. Can the initial history predict whether a child with a head injury has been abused? Pediatrics 2003;111:602–7.
19. Ichord RN, Naim M, Pollock AN, et al. Hypoxic-ischemic injury complicates inflicted and accidental traumatic brain injury in young children: the role of diffusion-weighted imaging. J Neurotrauma 2007;24:106–18.
20. Keenan HT, Runyan DK, Marshall SW, et al. A population-based comparison of clinical and outcome characteristics of young children with serious inflicted and noninflicted traumatic brain injury. Pediatrics 2004;114:633–9.
21. Kelly P, Hayes I. Infantile subdural haematoma in Auckland, New Zealand: 1988-1998. N Z Med J 2004;117:U1047.

Arch Dis Child 2011;96:1103–1112. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2011-300630

1111

Original article

Downloaded from adc.bmj.com on August 6, 2014 - Published by group.bmj.com

22. McKinney AM, Thompson LR, Truwit CL, et al. Unilateral hypoxic-ischemic injury in young children from abusive head trauma, lacking craniocervical vascular dissection or cord injury. Pediatr Radiol 2008;38:164–74.
23. Shugerman RP, Paez A, Grossman DC, et al. Epidural hemorrhage: is it abuse? Pediatrics 1996;97:664–8.
24. Tzioumi D, Oates RK. Subdural hematomas in children under 2 years. Accidental or inflicted? A 10-year experience. Child Abuse Negl 1998;22:1105–12.
25. Wells RG, Vetter C, Laud P. Intracranial hemorrhage in children younger than 3 years: prediction of intent. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2002;156:252–7.
26. Adamo MA, Drazin D, Smith C, et al. Comparison of accidental and nonaccidental traumatic brain injuries in infants and toddlers: demographics, neurosurgical interventions, and outcomes. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2009;4:414–19.
27. Hymel KP, Rumack CM, Hay TC, et al. Comparison of intracranial computed tomographic (CT) findings in pediatric abusive and accidental head trauma. Pediatr Radiol 1997;27:743–7.
28. Tung GA, Kumar M, Richardson RC, et al. Comparison of accidental and nonaccidental traumatic head injury in children on noncontrast computed tomography. Pediatrics 2006;118:626–33.
29. Vinchon M, Noulé N, Tchofo PJ, et al. Imaging of head injuries in infants: temporal correlates and forensic implications for the diagnosis of child abuse. J Neurosurg 2004;101:44–52.
30. Kemp AM, Rajaram S, Mann M, et al. What neuroimaging should be performed in children in whom inflicted brain injury (iBI) is suspected? A systematic review. Clin Radiol 2009;64:473–83.
31. Geddes JF, Hackshaw AK, Vowles GH, et al. Neuropathology of inflicted head injury in children. I. Patterns of brain damage. Brain 2001;124:1290–8.

32. Johnson DL, Boal D, Baule R. Role of apnea in nonaccidental head injury. Pediatr Neurosurg 1995;23:305–10.
33. Kemp AM, Stoodley N, Cobley C, et al. Apnoea and brain swelling in non-accidental head injury. Arch Dis Child 2003;88:472–6; discussion 472–6.
34. Shannon P, Smith CR, Deck J, et al. Axonal injury and the neuropathology of shaken baby syndrome. Acta Neuropathol 1998;95:625–31.
35. Dias MS, Backstrom J, Falk M, et al. Serial radiography in the infant shaken impact syndrome. Pediatr Neurosurg 1998;29:77–85.
36. Fobben ES, Grossman RI, Atlas SW, et al. MR characteristics of subdural hematomas and hygromas at 1.5 T. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989;153:589–95.
37. Friede RL, Schachenmayr W. The origin ofsubdural neomembranes. II. Fine structural of neomembranes. Am J Pathol 1978;92:69–84.
38. Schachenmayr W, Friede RL. The origin of subdural neomembranes. I. Fine structure of the dura-arachnoid interface in man. Am J Pathol 1978;92:53–68.
39. Joy HM, Anscombe AM, Gawne-Cain ML. Blood-stained, acute subdural hygroma mimicking a subacute subdural haematoma in non-accidental head injury. Clin Radiol 2007;62:703–6.
40. Zouros A, Bhargava R, Hoskinson M, et al. Further characterization of traumatic subdural collections of infancy. Report of five cases. J Neurosurg 2004;100:512–18.
41. Vinchon M, Noizet O, Defoort-Dhellemmes S, et al. Infantile subdural hematomas due to traffic accidents. Pediatr Neurosurg 2002;37:245–53.
42. Maguire S, Pickerd N, Farewell D, et al. Which clinical features distinguish inflicted from non-inflicted brain injury? A systematic review. Arch Dis Child 2009;94:860–7.

1112

Arch Dis Child December 2011 Vol 96 No 12

Preparing to load PDF file. please wait...

0 of 0
100%
Neuroimaging: what neuroradiological features distinguish